Ask for the documents
This is the step that has actually changed outcomes. Not the arguing — the asking. Denver's council reversed after a resident obtained the search logs[7]. Austin's flipped after its own audit surfaced[10]. Neither council knew what its data was being used for until somebody filed a request.
It takes one email. You do not need a lawyer, a reason, or any connection to the case — under California law, any person may ask, and the agency has ten days to respond.
Before you send
Send it to both places
Yucca Valley has no police department of its own — it contracts with the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department. Whoever holds the contract holds the records, and we do not yet know which it is. Send the same request to the Town and to the Sheriff's Department.
They have 10 days to respond
Government Code section 7922.535. Note that responding is not the same asproducing — an agency may claim up to 14 more days in unusual circumstances. Keep the email; the clock is useful.
Keep every reply
A refusal is evidence too. So is "no responsive records exist" — that tells you the contract lives somewhere else, and it tells the Council something as well.
Share whatever comes back
Send it to us, to the Desert Trumpet, to Z107.7, or just post it. A document in public is worth more than a document in your inbox.
Where to send them
Use the Town's official contact channels and the Sheriff's station page — we link to them rather than reproducing addresses that could go stale.
★Everything, in one emailStart here
Why this oneIf you send one request, send this. It asks for all four sets of records at once, plus the two things the Town has not answered: where the privacy policy the Council required went, and when the contract renews. One email, one 10-day clock, one paper trail.
What a good answer looks likeA single acknowledgement covering all items. Agencies sometimes split a broad request into parts with different production dates — that is normal, but hold them to the 10-day acknowledgement on the whole thing. If they call it unduly burdensome, ask them to say so in writing and to produce the items they can, which the Act requires.
01The contract itself
Why this oneEstablishes who signed, for how many cameras, at what price, and — critically — the renewal date. The renewal date is the deadline the whole campaign works backward from.
What a good answer looks likeA signed agreement, a purchase order, and a staff report. If the agency says no responsive records exist, that is itself an answer worth having in writing: it means the contract sits at the county, not the town.
02The usage policy and audits required by state law
Why this oneCalifornia Civil Code section 1798.90.51 requires any agency operating an ALPR system to publish a usage policy and conduct annual audits. If the agency cannot produce these, it is out of compliance with state law on its face — and that is a fact a council has to act on.
What a good answer looks likeA published policy document and an annual audit. A missing policy, or an audit that has never been performed, is the single strongest finding you can bring to a council meeting.
03The search logs — who looked, and why
Why this oneThis is the request that has changed outcomes. The logs show every search of local data: which agency ran it, when, and the stated reason. Denver's logs showed more than a thousand searches on behalf of federal immigration enforcement. Nobody knew until someone asked.
What a good answer looks likeA spreadsheet or export with one row per search. Look for out-of-state agencies, federal agencies, and reason fields that are blank, vague, or nonsense. Sharing ALPR data with out-of-state or federal agencies violates California Civil Code section 1798.90.55(b).
04Communications with the vendor
Why this oneShows what the agency was told before it signed, and what it was told afterward. In Oshkosh, Wisconsin, a council revoked its approval one day after discovering the company had given it a false answer in a public meeting.
What a good answer looks likeEmails, sales decks, and pilot proposals. Compare the claims made in the sales material against what the agency's own audit logs show.